June 9, 2021πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈDocument
Congressional

NRO: Internal Communication on UAPTF Report

An internal email from the National Reconnaissance Office detailed the agency's contributions to the classified UAP Task Force assessment. The correspondence revealed that geospatial and signals intelligence from partner agencies supported the congressional report. It also documented pending interviews with the Department of Defense Inspector General regarding UAP procedures.

Date
June 9, 2021
Type
Document
Country
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
Read-only context

Source context

No explicit primary-source marker in current data

This box summarizes currently attached sources and documents. It is not automatic verification and does not replace editorial review.

Attached sources
1
Related documents
1
Source types
portal (1)
Visible starting point Β· first listed source, not automatically primary
πŸ“š
TheBlackVault.com
John Greenewald Jr.
theblackvault.com

Background

On June 9, 2021, Thomas B. Bowman, serving as the National Reconnaissance Office's official Point of Contact for UAP Task Force matters, transmitted a TOP SECRET email to Director Christopher Scolese and senior deputies. This communication outlined three distinct efforts the NRO was undertaking regarding unidentified aerial phenomena. Most significantly, the message confirmed that the NRO had submitted four paragraphs of intelligence content for inclusion in the classified UAP Task Force report destined for Congressional review on June 25, 2021. The email further established that the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency provided GEOINT while the National Security Agency contributed SIGINT toward the UAP research effort, indicating that American spy satellites and intercepted communications played critical roles. Additionally, Bowman noted that the Department of Defense Inspector General had recently interviewed several officers from the NRO's Mission Integration Directorate as part of a broader evaluation launched in May 2021.

More community notes about this entry

These are personal research notes that community members chose to publish. They are not an editorial publication by the platform.