June 25, 2021πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈDocument
CongressionalClose Encounter

US Congress: Classified UAPTF Report Submitted

The UAP Task Force submitted a comprehensive classified assessment to Congressional intelligence committees. The seventeen-page document incorporated intelligence contributions from the NRO, NGA, and NSA regarding unidentified aerial phenomena. This submission represented the most significant formal government accounting of UAP encounters to date.

Date
June 25, 2021
Type
Document
Country
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
Read-only context

Source context

No explicit primary-source marker in current data

This box summarizes currently attached sources and documents. It is not automatic verification and does not replace editorial review.

Attached sources
1
Related documents
1
Source types
portal (1)
Visible starting point Β· first listed source, not automatically primary
πŸ“š
TheBlackVault.com
John Greenewald Jr.
theblackvault.com

Background

On June 25, 2021, the Department of Defense's Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force delivered a classified seventeen-page report to Congressional intelligence oversight committees. This assessment represented the U.S. government's most comprehensive formal accounting of military encounters with unexplained aerial objects. According to subsequently released National Reconnaissance Office documents, the classified report included four paragraphs of intelligence provided by the NRO, alongside geospatial intelligence from the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency and signals intelligence from the National Security Agency. The report required formal approval and sign-off from the NRO Director before inclusion, indicating rigorous interagency coordination. While the classified version contained detailed intelligence assessments, an unclassified version was also released to the public, marking a historic shift toward government transparency regarding UAP investigations.

More community notes about this entry

These are personal research notes that community members chose to publish. They are not an editorial publication by the platform.