Schumer-Rounds UAP Disclosure Act
Senators Chuck Schumer and Mike Rounds introduced a bipartisan amendment to the 2024 defense budget that would have established a review board with eminent domain authority over government-held UAP records.

Videos
Background
On July 13, 2023, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Republican Senator Mike Rounds filed the UAP Disclosure Act as an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024, drawing explicit structural parallels to the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992.
Legislative Framework
The amendment proposed a presidentially appointed review board empowered to compel the release of UAP-related records from any federal agency or private contractor. The legislation gained co-sponsorship from senators across the political spectrum, reflecting rare bipartisan momentum on the topic.
Key Provisions
- Granted the government eminent domain authority over recovered technologies or biological evidence of non-human intelligence held by private entities
- Represented an unprecedented legislative assertion that such materials might exist outside government custody
- Proposed an independent review board with enforcement powers
- Included transparency requirements and disclosure timelines
Congressional Process
The full Senate passed the language as part of its NDAA version. However, during the House-Senate conference committee process, the bill was substantially weakened. The eminent domain provision and the independent review board were removed, reportedly under pressure from defense industry interests and select House members.
Final Outcome
The enacted version preserved certain transparency requirements and disclosure timelines but lacked the enforcement mechanisms that advocates considered essential.
Significance
The Schumer-Rounds amendment represented the most ambitious legislative effort for UAP transparency in US history. Even in its diluted final form, it established an important precedent: bipartisan majorities in both chambers of Congress acknowledged that the UAP question warrants systematic government disclosure. The resistance it encountered also revealed the institutional forces opposing full transparency.